A few years ago I conducted
telephone interviews for a business-to-business market research project. I called librarians to ask their opinions of
a proposed new software product for libraries.
One woman told me very politely after I read the introduction that it
sounded like an interesting topic to discuss and that she would not mind taking
the time, but that she had recently agreed to do a telephone survey that turned
out to be an obscene phone call. She
said that she was very sorry, but that she would have to decline. I had been trained to overcome objections,
but this was a new one for me. I had to
mark the response for that library as refused to participate and move on.
The very next day, on the
same project, another woman told me that the survey I had called her about
sounded interesting, but that she had recently agreed to do a survey that
turned into an obscene phone call. This
time I was quicker on the uptake. I
asked the woman if we could have a female interviewer call her. She told me “Well, since you asked that
question, go ahead.” I was able to
complete the interview with her. I guess
some obscene callers have a thing for librarians.
This is one of many
anecdotes that I need to keep in mind as I investigate the use of speech
recognition technology to collect information for market research and public
opinion research telephone surveys. My
motivation for this investigation is not to reduce payroll costs, although that
is a consideration. Nor is my motivation
to eliminate the headaches involved in supervising human interviewers who
either do not want to work or who do not pay attention to instructions.
My motivation for
investigating the use of speech recognition technology for telephone
interviewing is that I think robot interviewers could get more accurate
information for our clients. Some of the
vendors of systems that use speech recognition technology for market research
interviewing use this as a selling point.
They say that it is actually an advantage for a respondent to know that
they are being interviewed by a robot because the respondent is more likely to
give an honest opinion.
I am thinking specifically
about a survey we did earlier this year.
We called registered voters throughout Ohio to ask them their opinions of proposed
legislation regarding animals. The
survey had questions about regulating the ownership of exotic animals, the
treatment of chickens on factory farms, and whether the penalty for
cockfighting should be a felony instead of a misdemeanor. I wondered at the time whether people would
give honest answers to these questions or if they would give what they
considered to be socially acceptable answers.
Who is going to say that they are in favor of cockfighting? A person might say that if they knew that
their answers would be kept confidential and if they did not have to say it to
a human interviewer.
We will most likely not use
speech recognition technology for telephone surveys until the technology
advances quite significantly. The
technology can now be used for simple surveys that have yes/no or
agree/disagree questions. It can skip a question based on an answer to a question if appropriate. It can record answers to open-ended questions, but cannot probe those responses. A robot interviewer would not know when and
when not to ask “Why?” The speech
recognition systems used in customer service applications can understand what a
customer is saying well enough to route a call to a human CSR and can even
schedule a reservation, but cannot actually help a customer resolve a billing
discrepancy.
Another consideration as I
investigate this issue is that researchers and their clients may rely less on
telephone polling in the future. Google
claims that its Google Surveys can provide data that is statistically
representative of a population. If so,
this will remove an obstacle to doing more research via the Internet.
John C. Stevens
jstevens@sapersteinassociates.com
No comments:
Post a Comment